Renowned Ghanaian media personality Haruna Babangida has commented on the recent tensions between the United States and Venezuela.
In a social media statement, the General Manager of Melody FM in Takoradi expressed his ambivalence towards the United States, noting, “I possess mixed feelings about America. I appreciate certain aspects today, yet may find them objectionable tomorrow.”
Babangida expressed skepticism regarding the extent to which American presidential selections reflect the will of the electorate. He suggested that such decisions appear increasingly determined by overarching international policy considerations. He posited that American administrations are often selected to fulfill specific strategic objectives.
For instance, he mentioned that Barack Obama was positioned to address issues in Africa, with a particular focus on Libya, while President Joe Biden was unable to secure Venezuelan oil, leading to a reversion to Donald Trump.
Babangida commented on the rationale behind the reinstatement of Trump, asserting that it pertained to distinct missions that required a specific leadership approach.
He further contended that, periodically, the United States opts for more radical leaders to implement equally radical policies.
He encouraged contemplation on the nature of American leadership, questioning how a Black individual could ascend to the presidency and how someone like Donald Trump could also achieve such a position, attributing these phenomena to intentional choices made by the influential powers within the United States.
He stated that the selection of leaders hinges on the desired trajectory of foreign policy, whereby more radical policies necessitate correspondingly radical leadership.
While he expressed admiration for the patriotism of the American populace, noting their deep attachment to their country, he did voice concerns regarding the perceived aggressive tendencies of U.S. government actions and their interference in the affairs of other nations.
He criticized the U.S. petrodollar system, characterizing it as akin to economic predation.
Babangida warned that if the United Nations and global leaders do not impose checks on American actions, the United States could, one day, contribute to significant global instability.
He anticipates addressing the roles of China and Russia as allies of various countries in a subsequent commentary, questioning why such allies are inactive when their counterparts are threatened by American interests.
Read Haruna Babangida’s post below
I have mixed feelings about America. I love them for one thing today, tomorrow I am hating them for another.
I doubt if America's choice of a president sorely depends on the American electorates. It appears choices are made depending on the direction of their international policies. American governments are built to carry out specific missions.
Obama was chosen for an African mission; Libya. Baiden wasn't built for/could not get them the Venezuelan oil, so they went back for Trump.
America brought back Trump for specific missions. From time to time, they choose radical leaders for radical missions.
If you've ever wondered how a black man became an American president and how a character like Donald Trump became an American president, that's because it's intentional; the real "King makers" of America choose who leads a regime depending on the nature of their international policy directions. The radical the policy directions, the more radical the leader chosen.
I've always expressed my love for the American people for their patriotism. The American people have America dear to their heart, they'll defend it at all cost and that's something likable for me.
What I don't like about America is the bully nature of their government regimes, their interference in other people's "businesses". Their petrodollar economy made them "armed robbers". When China persuades you to steal from you, America forces his way in.
If America is not checked by the UN/world leaders, America will plunge the world into a serious chaos someday.
I'll address China and Russia as allies of countries separately later in the day or tomorrow morning. Aren't allies supposed to be standing by each other in times of trouble?? Why is China nowhere to be found when their allies are in trouble (under the mercy of America)?
.jpeg)
0 Comments